Skip to main content

Is it worth installing grid-connected solar panels?

We had a solar panel salesman call up and ask to come out and talk to us about his product.  I thought it was a good opportunity to do some easy research.  We'd been thinking about solar panels since my parents-in-law installed a few.  We weren't sure if it was worth doing or not.  This is my analysis of our situation.

Depending where you live in Australia, most states will pay a feed in tariff for solar panels on your property connected to the grid.  However, if the power goes off, your panels get turned off to keep the lines dead (for the safety of those working on the lines to restore power).  Our biggest problem with electricity is losing power during storms, so panels that turn off aren't that useful.

At the moment the cost of grid-connected solar panels is also subsidised by the Australian Federal Government's renewable energy certificate (REC) scheme.  The panel installers buy from you the right to sell "renewable energy certificates" on your behalf.  These operate in a market, so the price fluctuates and the installer takes a risk in offering to buy these from you, assuming that they can sell them on the market for a certain price.  Economics, yuck!

Nobody knows how long the feed in tarif price will be so good (44c/kWh in Queensland at the time of writing) or how long the REC scheme will last, so there's a feeling that its a good time to install solar panels, just in case everything changes after the next state and federal elections.

Our situation is unique in that our work subsidises our electricity bill as part of our salary packages, we get about $1200/year toward electricity, which pretty much covers all our electricity bills, so I wasn't sure if installing panels would be worth the money for us.  Our work will still pay for everything we buy from the grid, but during the day, the panels will supply the house and sell any extra electricity to the grid.  Normally you can just work out how much you would save on your electricity bill by not buying electricity and how much you will receive in electricity sold to the grid, but I can only include revenue in my calculations, as our electricity is effectively free anyway.

I was interested to find out more though, so we had a chat to the solar panel man and a few other companies, online and in person.  This how I worked out our situation, you can substitute your own figures based on your energy usage and your state's/country's solar panel schemes.

Work out how much electricity you use, day and night
You can get your daily usage from your electricity bill, but wanted to know how much electricity we used during the day (when the solar panels are generating) and how much you use at night, so I could work out what we would really save (as our work will still pay for everything we use).  The best way to work this out is to read your meter morning and evening, depending on your sunset time, for me in the sub-tropics this doesn't change much, but if you're further from the equator the seasons could make a big difference.

In my case, we use about 16-17 kWh/day, and this is fairly evenly distributed between day and night (meaning that most of it is "baseload", ie too many fridges!).  

Work out how much electricity you might be able to generate
This will depend on the size of your system and the amount of sun you get.  The Clean Energy Council has published a Consumer Guide to Solar PV, which has a table of typical daily energy production (kWh) per installed capacity (kW) for various cities in Australia.  The typical system sizes in Australia are 1.5, 2 and 3 kW.  The maximum size eligible for a feed-in tariff in QLD is only 5 kW.  I evaluated the energy production of 1.5, 2 and 3 kW systems, using the 4.2 kWh/kW/day figure measured for Brisbane.  As this is an average figure, I considered a range of 3.6-4.8 kWh/kW/day.

From my calculations, the electricity produced per day would range from 5.4 kWh (worst case, 1.5 kW system) to 14.4 kWh (best case, 3 kW system).  As our electricity is effectively free, we really need to generate more that we just during the day in order to cover the cost of the system.  This means that the minimum system size for us is 2 kW, as that would just cover our daily electricity use on average, however to ensure that we get a consistent return, we'd be better to get a 3 kW system.

If you are paying for your electricity, then any production of electricity is a saving for you, and the amount you feed into the grid is an extra bonus. 

Work out how much you will save
As I mentioned above, we only achieve a saving if we generate electricity.  With a 3 kW system, our savings would be $100-250/quarter.  If we weren't getting our electricity for free, our savings would be $240-380/quarter (assuming we paid $300/quarter normally), and even the smallest 1.5 kW system would save $80/quarter in the worst case scenario.

Find out how much the panels will cost you
I wish I'd done the ground-work above so that I could known what system I needed BEFORE I talked to the salesmen!  But I didn't know anything about solar, so it has been a little circular, but now that you've read this post, you can do the research before you talk to the solar companies.

The companies that I approached told me about the various products available, and this is where it gets really difficult to make comparisons.  The system consists of panels, an inverter and all the bits the hold it on the roof, as well as the labour to install it.  While some companies may appear cheaper, you really need to check on the quality of the products, the warranties and the qualifications of the installers.  The products available seem to range from cheap (designed and made in China), medium (designed in Japan/Germany, made in China) to expensive (designed and made in Japan/Germany).  

The product that you choose depends on how long you expect to stay in the house and risk that you're willing to take.  We're not intending to stay here forever, but don't want to deal with a faulty product, so I would stick to the medium price range.  Of the companies we talked to, some had their own installers that travel and some contract to local installers.  I prefer the first type, as you know they have experience with the product.

The prices for a 1.5 kW system ranged from $4000 to $8000, add a few thousand as you go up in size.  The 3 kW systems ranged from $7000 - $10 000.  But be aware that you can negotiate different inverters and panel support systems into the packages, which can help you to get a better price (although potentially reducing quality).

Divide cost by annual savings to give a rough "pay back period"
In my case, considering the potential revenue only, the pay back on the 3 kW system, at average generation rates, is about 10-14 years.  However, if I was also paying for electricity, the payback would be more like 5-8 years on the same system.  The pay back on the smaller systems is longer as the feed in tariff is about twice the amount we pay for electricity, so you really have to repeat these calculations with consideration of your own situation.

Decide if its worth doing
For us the 10 year pay back period is just not good enough, we'd be better spending that money investing in a system to support us off-grid when we lose power.  However, if we were paying for electricity, then a 5 year pay back would be acceptable, given that it should also add value to our house.  

Our situation may change, we may change jobs, or our company may stop subsidising our electricity, and if that happens I can re-evaluate the calculations to see if we should invest in solar panels.  I just hope that we don't miss out on good rebates or fail to lock in the good feed-in tariffs, but that's a risk we have to take.

Of course there are also environmental concerns to consider.  Unfortunately grid-connected solar probably isn't as good for the environment as one may initially think.  If you are still connected to the grid you are still relying on "thermal" (coal) power overnight.  The worst part is that those power stations don't stop and start quickly, they run inefficiently at partial-load during the day, so they can supply you at higher loads during the night, especially if you use a strategy to get maximum revenue from your panels by using more electricity at night rather than when you are generating your own power.  If you really want to avoid carbon emissions you need to buy only "green power" from renewable sources or install an "off-grid" system with battery storage.  Otherwise your main contribution is to fund product development for better solar panels.

Have you installed solar panels?  What is your experience?  How did you come to your decision?


  1. Hey that's interesting. I didn't realise you could feed electricity back into the grid. I wonder if it's the same case in NZ.

    I've often wondered about solar panels, but it does seem a bit pointless if they get switched off when you would most want them to work - ie. a power outage.

    I'm sure someone with clever electrical skills could rig some kind of switch so that in a black out they got turned off from feeding back into the grid, but still fed your house or ran a generator or something.

    I quite like the idea of wind turbines - appropriate for Wellington. If we ever buy a bit of land, I would look into installing a wind turbine to help us move towards being off-grid too.

    Either way, it's cool that your work pays for your power and you still put all this thought into generating your own power.

  2. Just seeing the comment above (Emma), we looked into the cost of solar panels and wind turbines, and their efficiency in New Zealand where we are (near Dunedin, south island), and found that the best way to cut our electricity was to put in a wood burner and a small woodlot (200 trees).

    We've got 3 acres, and with 200 trees (can fit on about 1/2 to 3/4 of an acre, depending on spacing), we'll be self-reliant in wood.

    As most of our electricity goes on heating, that's the best way to cut our bills.

    Sure, it's not being independent, but as the stoves we're looking at will cook as well as heat, it's good enough for a "rainy day scenario" for us. And a lot less costly.

    In the end, it sounds brutal, but it comes down to dollars. A wind setup to enable us to be independent was going to cost us over $50K, and a solar setup over $20K. We can do a woodstove plus trees for less than $3K.

  3. that's really interesting Leanne, we also have a wood stove that we cook on and that saves us heaps in winter.

  4. We also thought about installing the solar panels, but so far, think we shall put it on hold... we are also using a woodstove and we enjoy cooking with it so much... no electricity required, just efforts on my part to chop wood...

  5. Hi Liz - Yeah, we only moved in two years ago, and so far it's been fencing and other priorities chewing up our budget (keeping in stock sort of takes priority!).

    This year is putting in the woodlot and wood stove, plus a lot of general landscaping, and removal of a pool (outdoor pool in Dunedin - sheesh!).

    Doing the calculations for solar, it's just not worth the money for us. We're on 100% green tariff for our electricity anyway, so I'm pretty happy with where we stand environmentally. But the woodstove will make a HUGE difference to our costs.

  6. We live in Melbourne where our power comes from burning coal. Six months ago we made the decision to install panels. Yes, the pay back period is long. But money is only one factor in making the decision. We sleep well at night knowing that our 'investment' though not financially prudent is right for the environment.

  7. Thanks Leanne for your comment about the woodlot. That's really interesting, and not something I had considered so I'll bear it in mind.

  8. We thought about solar but our normal usage is only 7kwhs per day at the moment for the 2 of us which I am told is pretty low considering we run pumps for the house, I work on the computer 5 days a week from home and have air con in the office at home that I use during summer.

  9. Its true that there are some environmental benefit BUT some fundamental changes to our electricity network and market are required to really make a difference. As it stands, extra renewable energy feeding into the grid means that the baseload coal stations (80% of Australia's electricity is generated by coal) are required to run at partial load, which is less efficient. This means that they produce more CO2 per MWh generated. I think I need to write a more detailed post on my thoughts on this topic!

  10. Thanks for all the advice. I think it could actually save a lot of money buy getting residential solar panel installation in Los Angeles. What if there is no sun for a while though, how long do they stay charged?


Post a Comment

Thanks, I appreciate all your comments, suggestions and questions, but I don't always get time to reply right away. If you need me to reply personally to a question, please leave your email address in the comment or in your profile, or email me directly on eight.acres.liz at

Popular posts from this blog

Chicken tractor guest post

Sign up for my weekly email updates here , you will find out more about chickens, soap and our farmlife, straight to your inbox, never miss a post!  New soap website and shop opening soon.... Tanya from Lovely Greens invited me to write a guest post on chicken tractors for her blog.  I can't believe how many page views I get for chicken tractors, they seem to be a real area of interest and I hope that the information on my blog has helped people.  I find that when I use something everyday, I forget the details that other people may not be aware of, so in this post for Tanya, I tried to just write everything I could think of that I haven't covered in previous posts.  I tried to explain everything we do and why, so that people in other locations and situations can figure out how best to use chicken tractors with their own chickens. The dogs like to hang out behind the chicken tractors and eat chicken poo.  Dogs are gross! If you want to read more about chicken tractor

Getting started with beekeeping: how to harvest honey

While honey is not the only product from a beehive, its the one that most beekeepers are interested in and it usually takes a year or so to let the bees build up numbers and store enough honey before there is enough to harvest.  There are a few different ways to extract honey from frames.  We have a manual turn 2-frame certifugal extractor.  A lot of people with only a few hives will just crush and strain the comb.  This post is about how we've been extracting honey so far (four times now), and there are links at the end to other bloggers who use different methods so you can compare. Choose your frames Effectively the honey is emergency food stores for the bees, so you have to be very careful not to take too much from the hive.  You need to be aware of what is flowering and going to flower next and the climate.  Particularly in areas with cold winters, where the bees cannot forage for some time.  We are lucky to have something flowering most of the year and can take honey

Homekill beef - is it worth it?

We got another steer killed a few weeks ago now, and I weighed all the cuts of meat so that I could work out the approximate value of the meat and compare the cost of raising a steer to the cost of buying all the meat from the butcher.   My article has been published on the Farm Style website , which is a FREE online community for small and hobby farmers to learn everything about farming and country living . If you want to know more, head over the Farm Style to  read the the article  and then come back here for comments and questions.  Do you raise steers?  Is it worth it?  Do you have any questions? More about our home butchering here .